Ron Paul not so much.
Mitt Romney not so much.
Newt Gingrich, deeper.
Re-Group?
NOW, was that what I was talking about? Just teasing. Or "tough surrogate"?
Not having reviewed each of the links, nevertheless here are hints to my G'Ribble.
Under "Mitt Romney" there was a hint that the debate was "on a topic that he should dominate: the economy". Hence the "ledership" of The Big Dig? Investment in infrastructure anyone?
[Then there is the Laffer Curve of Regulation Job Growth. Which is my twist on not just the misuse of the curve, but the avoidance of* regulation. Regulation could be increasing jobs, if they were not avoiding the regulations.]
*the real laugher is in the "willing to report" and the needless "math genious".
[Coffee Party / Organizing Wall Street: De Calf anyone?]
No comments:
Post a Comment